Legal Opinion

Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1988No. 80966, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*451Archer, J.

We granted leave to appeal to decide whether the threshold requirements of MCL 500.3135(1); MSA 24.13135(1)1 apply when a motorist seeks benefits for noneconomic loss under the uninsured motorist provision of his no-fault policy. As a preliminary issue, we must determine the scope of tort liability of any uninsured motorist for noneconomic damages arising from an automobile collision.

We hold that uninsured motorists are subject to tort liability for noneconomic loss only if the injured person has suffered death, serious impairment of body function, or permanent serious…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Garrett v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Energetics, Ltd v. WhitmillMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Adam v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API