Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1970No. 43195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, three years.

The indictment alleged that the appellant did “unlawfully, knowingly and fraudulently pass as true to Ana M. Ortiz, a forged instrument in writing of the tenor following:”

No. 6722_

ATLAS MOTOR SERVICE 88-15

1128 Texas 533-6865 1120

El Paso, Texas 79901 El Paso, Texas 8/17 1968

Pay

to the J34

order of Marcos B. Padilla_$ 73

84

seventy three Dollars 00_Dollars

EL PASO NATIONAL BANK

El Paso, Texas Roy S. Hensley

1120 0015 115 040 6

and that he knew the same to be forged and did pass the same as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Moulton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API