State v. Solano
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, J.
{1} The State appeals from dismissal of the criminal charges against Defendant under Rule 5 — 604(B)(5) NMRA 1998 (providing for criminal trial within six months of the date of the defendant’s arrest for failure to appear) (the six-month rule). According to the State, the trial court should have commenced calculation of the six-month rule from the date when New Mexico authorities arrested Defendant and took him into custody rather than the date of his arrest in Colorado by Colorado authorities. We disagree and therefore affirm the trial court’s dismissal.
I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. CleveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CardenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GranadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. SolanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.