Legal Opinion
State v. Granado
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 2007No. 26,469PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} The issue presented in this case is whether Defendant’s trial in the metropolitan court commenced within the 182 days specified by Rule 7-506 NMRA. We hold that the trial did not commence within the time specified by the Rule, and reverse Defendant’s conviction.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{2} On September 12, 2004, Defendant was arrested by a New Mexico State Police officer and charged in the metropolitan court with aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI), second offense. NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(D)(3) (2005). Defendant was arraigned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Walker v. WaltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. CarrollNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. CarrollNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.