Legal Opinion

In re Campbell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 30, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2016-002528; Opinion No. 27735Published

1Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary matter arises out of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel against Robert Clenten Campbell of Walterboro. Because Campbell did not respond to the charges, the factual allegations are deemed admitted under Rule 24(a) of the Rules of Lawyer Discipline. Rule 413, SCACR. Thus, the sole issue before the Court is the appropriate sanction. A hearing panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct recommends we suspend Campbell for three years, order him to pay restitution and the costs of the proceedings, and order him to complete ethics training. Neither…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Mark Andrew BruntySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API