Legal Opinion
Merck & Co. v. Chase Chemical Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 1, 1967No. Civ. A. 270-62PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AUGELLI, District Judge:
This is an action for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,563,-794 (’794 patent) and No. 2,703,302 (’302 patent). The subject matter is vitamin B-12 and vitamin B-12 active compositions.
Plaintiff Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck) is a New Jersey corporation, having a place of business in Rahway, New Jersey, and is the owner, by assignment, of the ’794 and '302 patents.
Defendant Chase Chemical Company (Chase), is a New Jersey corporation, having a place of business in Newark, New Jersey.
Defendants Sidney and Randolph Chasman, are residents of New Jersey,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In re BergyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- General Electric Company v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.