Pasternack v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
Plaintiff Howard Pasternack brought suit to recover the expenses incurred for his daughter in connection with travel pursuant to the signing of a renewal agreement for civilian employment with the U.S. Air Force. Defendant moved for dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction or failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff is a civilian architect employed by the U.S. Air Force in Blenheim Crescent,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Montilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Snakenberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Rochman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992