Legal Opinion

Pasternack v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 24, 1987No. 597-86CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

Plaintiff Howard Pasternack brought suit to recover the expenses incurred for his daughter in connection with travel pursuant to the signing of a renewal agreement for civilian employment with the U.S. Air Force. Defendant moved for dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction or failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

FACTS

Plaintiff is a civilian architect employed by the U.S. Air Force in Blenheim Crescent,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Montilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Snakenberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Rochman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API