Legal Opinion

Wota v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91SC426PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the summary judgment entered by the district court for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado (Blue Cross) and the dismissal of Michael Joseph Wota’s claim, under a group health plan, for medical expense benefits related to heart transplant surgery. Wota v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 820 P.2d 1137 (Colo.App.1991). We affirm.

At the time in controversy Wota was insured under a “Custom Plus” group health plan issued by Blue Cross. Under the plan, Wota received major medical-surgical and hospital benefits coverage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Fiorangelo Spezialetti and Lorraine Spezialetti, Husband and Wife, D/B/A Spezi's Lorraine Spezialetti v. Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Essex Insurance Company v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API