Legal Opinion

Fiorangelo Spezialetti and Lorraine Spezialetti, Husband and Wife, D/B/A Spezi's Lorraine Spezialetti v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-5453PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case, a wife asserts that as an innocent spouse she is entitled to recover fire insurance proceeds on jointly owned premises that were destroyed by arson for which her husband was convicted. The district court held that since both husband and wife were named insureds in the policy, an exclusion denying coverage where a fraudulent act was committed by “any insured” applied. We agree and will affirm summary judgment for the defendant insurer.

Plaintiff Lorraine Spezialetti and her husband Fiorangelo owned and operated a bakery business in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Mele v. All-Star Ins. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Bonin v. Westport Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API