Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. B & R, Inc. v. Donald Lane Construction
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 14, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-198 MMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
Introduction
Use plaintiff B & R, Inc. (“B & R”) 1 filed a complaint on April 21, 1997 against Donald Lane Construction (“Lane”), Commercial Industrial Construction & Supply Co., Inc. (“CICS”), and National Surety Corporation (“NSC”). The complaint, which arose out of labor performed by B & R in 1996 as part of a construction project, stated a federal cause of action based on the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., and state law breach of contract and quantum meruit claims. In July 1997, a default judgment was entered against Lane. In January…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Tippett v. DalyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.