People v. Irizarry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentSmith, J.
I dissent *380for the reasons which caused me to disagree with the majority opinion in Matter of Antoine W. (162 AD2d 121 [1st Dept 1990]). Moreover, the appeal should be held in abeyance and the case remanded for a determination as to whether Rosario material was turned over to the defense.
There was an articulable reason sufficient to justify the police officer’s approach and inquiry of the defendant. (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 213 [1976].) There also was sufficient evidence of a voluntary consent to the search of the bag in which cocaine was found. (People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122 [1976].)
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.