Legal Opinion

People v. Payne

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1980PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant claims that it was reversible error for the *745People to have failed to give him, prior to trial, the memorandum of a statement previously made by a prosecution witness (see People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286). The memorandum in question was the recorded statement made by Officer De Setto, an eyewitness to the crime, and was provided to defendant during the trial but after De Setto had testified.

Defendant alleges that the failure to afford him an opportunity to use this statement in cross-examination of De…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. ConsolazioNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Maurice Mayo v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. ChristopherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. GarrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API