People v. Ranghelle
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*59OPINION OF THE COURT
Simons, J.
These two appeals present, in different contexts, various problems involving the application of the Rosario rule (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, rearg denied 9 NY2d 908, cert denied 368 US 866, rearg denied 14 NY2d 876, rearg denied 15 NY2d 765; see also, CPL 240.45). That rule requires generally that the People provide defense counsel with all pretrial statements of prosecution witnesses. The questions raised by these prosecutions include the nature of Rosario material; the obligation of the People to produce it even though it is available to the defense by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. ConsolazioNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MalinskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by304 opinions
- Maurice Mayo v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. NovoaNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.