Legal Opinion

Kleinsasser v. McNamara

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1932No. Docket No. 8301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

After the appeal in. the above-entitled cause was placed on the calendar for oral argument, appellants filed an application under the authority of section 956a of the Code of Civil Procedure to take additional evidence.

The action was instituted in the Superior Court of Fresno County by appellants as stockholders of the Siberia Oil Company to enjoin the directors thereof from consummating a transaction whereby the properties of said company were about to be transferred to Delaney Petroleum Corporation; and the essential issues of fact upon which the action was heard and determined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Davis v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hiram Lodge No. 18 v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. First National Bank v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Monsan Homes, Inc. v. PogrebneakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Kier Corp. v. Treasure Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API