State v. Dydasco
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
Petitioner claims he received insufficient notice of the State’s intention to seek a 180-day involuntary commitment. We agree and hold those facing 180-day commitments are entitled to at least 3 days’ notice .of further commitment proceedings.
On January 26, 1995, the State petitioned the King County Superior Court to commit Petitioner, Kenneth Dydasco, to 90 days of involuntary treatment. The superior court commissioner entered an agreed order committing Petitioner to 90 days of “[l]ess Restrictive [treatment,” as opposed to intensive treatment. Clerk’s Papers at 1. He was required to keep…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Personal Restraint of KnappWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Allison v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Detention of BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.