Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Dunn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 2017No. 16–5294PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

Thirty-one years ago, petitioner James Edmond McWilliams, Jr., was convicted of capital murder by an Alabama jury and sentenced to death. McWilliams challenged his sentence on appeal, arguing that the State had failed to provide him with the expert mental health assistance the Constitution requires, but the Alabama courts refused to grant relief. We now consider, in this habeas corpus case, whether the Alabama courts' refusal was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law." 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1). We hold that it was. Our decision in Ake v.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Azar v. Allina Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. Wholaver, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Michael Apelt v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. People of Michigan v. Johnny Ray KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2021

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API