Legal Opinion

Carey v. Musladin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 11, 2006No. 05-785PublishedCited by 1,157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

This Court has recognized that certain courtroom practices are so inherently prejudicial that they deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Estelle v. Williams, 425 U. S. 501, 503-506 (1976); Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U. S. 560, 568 (1986). In this case, a state court held that buttons displaying the victim’s image worn by the victim’s family during respondent’s trial did not deny respondent his right to a fair trial. We must decide whether that holding was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by this Court. 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1). We hold…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,157 opinions

  1. Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Cavazos v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Woods v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

1,152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API