Legal Opinion
Ritonga v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 28, 2011No. 09-9539PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Roozana Maria Ritonga, joined by her husband Nelson Estomihi Simanungkalit, petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her application for asylum and restriction on removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), and request for protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s final orders of removal, deportation, and exclusion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We deny Ms. Ritonga’s petition.
I
Ms. Ritonga was born and raised Christian in Indonesia. She…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Marta Brigida Melgar De Torres v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Vera KORABLINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Karki v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Ibarra v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Jimenez-Guzman v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Ting Xue v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Htun v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.