Legal Opinion

Ting Xue v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 25, 2016No. 15-9540PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Respondent Loretta E. Lynch’s unopposed Motion to Amend the Decision and Petitioner Ting Xue’s Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc.

The panel grants the Respondent’s unopposed Motion to Amend and, thereby, replaces the phrase “clear error” with the phrase “substantial evidence” in the first and third sentences on page four of the *1101slip opinion and the final sentence of footnote ten. A copy of the revised opinion, filed nunc pro tunc to the original filing date of November 25, 2016, is attached to this order.

Petitioner Xue’s Petition for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Beskovic v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Zhihui Guo v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Aguilar-Escoto v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  3. R‑A‑F‑Board of Immigration Appeals · 2020
  4. Escobar-Hernandez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Xiaojie He v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API