Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Tidd

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1943No. 2711PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

Purcell, Oklahoma, is a city of the first class, organized under a municipal charter adopted in accordance with Article 18, Section 3(a) of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma. The city created a street improvement district, levied benefit assessments against the property therein, and issued bonds to pay for the cost of the improvements. Certain installments against some of the property were not paid. The city clerk certified the delinquencies to the county treasurer, who placed the lots liable for such assessments on the delinquent tax list. At the November, 1935…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Prince v. Ypsilanti Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Chamberlain v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Swearingen v. McCartanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Henshaw v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Home Fire Assur. Co. of New York v. Mid-West Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Dickinson v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API