Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1943No. 2712PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to Dickinson et al. v. Tidd et al., 10 Cir., 137 F.2d 610, decided August 5, 1943. The controversy arose out of a bond issue for street improvements in the city of Purcell, Okla- . homa. Default was made in the payment of some of the special benefit assessments levied against property in the district. The delinquent assessments were certified to the county treasurer as by law required, and the property liable was sold and bid off in the name of the county at the November, 1935 tax sale, and was further advertised for resale at the 1938 resale tax…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Harn v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Blythe v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Peckham v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Transok Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Harris v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City of Eufaula v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API