Dubbe v. Lano Equipment, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a directed verdict for Lano Equipment on the issue of fraud. The Dubbes also appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, asserting that mutual mistake was proven as a matter of law. The Dubbes appeal denial of their motion for a new trial, arguing that the instructions to the jury were erroneous. We affirm the trial court’s directed verdict on the issue of fraud, but grant a new trial because the instructions on the issue of mutual mistake were erroneous. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Larry…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- C. H. Young Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Thomsen v. ReibelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carpenter v. VreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Beihua Sheng v. Starkey LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Free Spirit Publishing Inc. v. DworskyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Moratzka v. Loop Corp. (In Re Health Risk Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2005