Legal Opinion

Dubbe v. Lano Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1985No. CO-84-1044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict for Lano Equipment on the issue of fraud. The Dubbes also appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, asserting that mutual mistake was proven as a matter of law. The Dubbes appeal denial of their motion for a new trial, arguing that the instructions to the jury were erroneous. We affirm the trial court’s directed verdict on the issue of fraud, but grant a new trial because the instructions on the issue of mutual mistake were erroneous. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Larry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. C. H. Young Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Thomsen v. ReibelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. VreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Beihua Sheng v. Starkey LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Free Spirit Publishing Inc. v. DworskyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Moratzka v. Loop Corp. (In Re Health Risk Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API