Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Vreeman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1987No. C0-86-1811PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellants Laurel Carpenter, Jean Sullivan and Marion Lingbeck sued respondent Joseph Vreeman to rescind a contract for deed and recover payments made under the contract. Appellants alleged that respondent represented the property as accessible by a town road, that these representations were false and material to the transaction, and that appellants suffered harm as a result of their reliance on the representations. Appellant also sought rescission on the grounds of mutual mistake in formulation of the contract.

The trial court determined that the contract unambiguously…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Pasko v. TrelaNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. C. H. Young Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Timothy Olmsted v. Saint Paul Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API