Legal Opinion

Neal v. Miller

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 4, 1991No. G87-467 CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff’s claims under the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are dismissed. Judgment is entered in favor…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  2. Brown v. BuschDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  3. Mickle v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Banks v. Lackawanna County CommissionersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Stults v. Symrise, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API