Heuel v. Wallowa County
Oregon Supreme Court
From "Wallowa: John W. Knowles, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Me. Justice Bean. Peter Heuel, tbe plaintiff, obtained a writ of review to re-examine tbe action of tbe County Court of Wallowa County in the matter of vacating a county highway. Tbe Circuit Court dismissed tbe writ, thereby affirming tbe proceedings of tbe County Court, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
1, 2. It is maintained by counsel for plaintiff that tbe act of 1903 (Laws 1903, p. 262; L. O. L., § 6279), ' in so far as tbe same authorizes tbe vacation of county *356roads and highways, is repugnant to Article IV, Section 20, of the state Constitution, which provides that:
“Every act shall embrace but one subject, and matters properly connected therewith, which subject shall be expressed in the title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Eastman v. Jennings-McRae Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Curran v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Clemmensen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Preble v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Lauderback v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Giesy v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Lauderback v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.