Giesy v. Marion County
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: George G. Bingham, Judge. Department 1. This is a writ of review to test the establishment of a county road. The trial court dismissed the writ, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
1. The first error specified in the petition for the writ is that the notices posted were insufficient for the reason that they did not contain all of the names of the petitioners for the road. It ap*452pears from the return to the writ, that pursuant to Section 6279, L. O. L., the petition, for the road was signed by thirty freeholders residing in the road district wherein the proposed road was petitioned to be laid out and established. That in conformity with Section 6280, L. O. L., the notices posted each contained the names of the same number of such freeholders. In addition to such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bewley v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Douglas County Road Co. v. County of DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1877
- Lord v. County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
- French v. Harney CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Heuel v. Wallowa CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Lauderback v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1924