Michael Anderson v. State of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Justice.
“Ours not to reason why, ours but to read, and apply. It is our duty to accept the law as the legislative body enacts it.” Holland v. State, 253 Iowa 1006, 1011, 115 N.W.2d 161, 164 (1962) (Thomp son, J.). 1 In this case we must • decide whether a convicted sex offender incarcerated after revocation of his probation is entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent living at home under supervised probation wearing an electronic monitoring device on his ankle. The district court denied the credit, and a divided court of appeals affirmed. Although it is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harrington v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- The Sherwin-williams Company Vs. Iowa Department Of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State of Iowa v. Dalevonte Davelle HearnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Carson Michael WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State of Iowa v. Craig E. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- City of Riverdale, Iowa v. Allen Diercks, Marie Randol, and Tammie PictonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- In the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Kris Kolzow v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.