Legal Opinion

King v. Fleming

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. James Steele, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action was brought on a promissory note made in the State of Indiana. The defense urged is, it was executed on Sunday, and, by the laws of that State, it is made unlawful to engage “in common labor” or “usual avocations, works of charity or necessity, only, excepted.” Hence it is insisted the note is void.

The testimony shows the note was written sometime during the week prior to the day it bears date. It was, in fact, signed by appellant on Sunday, but not delivered to appellee until Monday. There is no evidence as to when the other maker signed his name. In the absence of proof, it will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. GaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  2. Lovejoy v. WhippleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  3. Reynolds ex rel. Haines v. StevensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Link v. ClemmensIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  5. Banks v. WertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richmond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Weinsklar Realty Co. v. DooleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Burns & Co. v. Moore & McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. A. Helm & Son v. BrileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Evert v. KleimenhagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API