Legal Opinion
Curry v. Wright, Sr.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 7, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C. J.
This was a suit by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error on .a note not under seal. The note was as follows:
“One year after date I promise to pay to the order of myself or bearer $5,000.00
FIVE THOUSAND & NO/100 Dollars
at any bank .................., for value received, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum ■ until paid, together with reasonable attorney’s fee, if given after maturity to an attorney for collection.
G. E. Curry.”
It appears from the record that the defendant was represented in the court below by one entirely ignorant of the law of pleading and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Brett v. First National Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Loeb v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Sayre v. LeonardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ulsch v. Mountain City Mill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- CITY NAT. BANK OF MIAMI NA v. WernickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Harmony Homes, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- First National Bank in Fort Lauderdale v. HuntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.