Legal Opinion
Raynor v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1940No. 27792PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
Plaintiff, L. G. Raynor, brought this action to enjoin defendant King county from issuing general obligation bonds to fund outstanding warrants, the total amount of the principal of which is $1,919,-505.75. The complaint alleges that, at the time such warrants were issued, King county was indebted in excess of its statutory debt limit of one and one-half per cent, and was so indebted at all times since; that such warrants were not issued either for mandatory expenses or for expenditures necessary for the existence of the county; that the emergency warrants were issued when, in fact, no…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Barton v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Porter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liddell v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Craton Liddell v. State of Missouri, Craton Liddell v. City of St. Louis, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant. In Re City of St. Louis, Paul Berra and Ronald A. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Liddell v. Board of Educ. of City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
- Lecocq Motors, Inc. v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Shoreline School District No. 412 v. Taxpayers of Shoreline School District No. 412Washington Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.