Legal Opinion
Shoreline School District No. 412 v. Taxpayers of Shoreline School District No. 412
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1958No. 34622PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The respondent, Shoreline school district No. 412, plaintiff below, sued under the declaratory judgment act, relating to bond issues (RCW chapter 7.25), seeking a determination that its bonds were a valid indebtedness. Pursuant to RCW 7.25.020 (Laws of 1939, chapter 153, § 2, p. 452), the court appointed a resident taxpayer to represent the other taxpayers of the district. The taxpayer so appointed appeals from the judgment determining that the bonds in question were a valid obligation of the respondent school district.
The facts were stipulated and carried forward by the court’s findings of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Wheeler School District No. 152 v. HawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Anderson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MelcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Namer Investment Corp. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Port Townsend School District No. 50 v. BrouilletCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.