Legal Opinion

Lecocq Motors, Inc. v. Whatcom County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1940No. 27948PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by LeCocq Motors, Inc., and eighteen other firms and individuals, against Whatcom county, J. W. Austin, Albert Anderson, and Frank Cramer, as county commissioners of Whatcom county, and Pliny T. Snyder, as auditor of Whatcom county, to recover for labor, materials, supplies, and rental equipment, all furnished at the request of Whatcom county since January 1, 1939, upon a WPA flood control project in Whatcom county.

Defendants, by their answer, admit that the services were rendered, and the material and supplies furnished, as alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Linden v. BungeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Edmundson v. FriedellIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Quinn v. GormleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Raynor v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. La Lone v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Becwar v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Edward L. Eyre & Co. v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API