Legal Opinion
Swart v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1942No. Civ. 13260PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J., pro tem.
This action, and Swart v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles, Civ. No. 12703, (ante, p. 824 [120 Pac. (2d) 697]), this day decided, were tried together, it having been stipulated that the testimony taken at the trial might go to both actions, but each action was to be considered and decided separately.
Inasmuch as we have recited in the opinion in that case the facts relative to the marriage of the plaintiff and Ms wife; their living together; her mental illness, and the detailed testimony of witnesses who established that she was incompetent at the time of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Hiett v. Inland Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Swart v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hambrick v. HambrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.