Legal Opinion

Hiett v. Inland Finance Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4327PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action brought for the cancellation of a note and mortgage, executed by the respondents in favor of The Inland Finance Corporation, hereinafter referred to as appellant, on the alleged ground that the same were executed and delivered under fear and menace resulting from threats made by the president of the appellant that unless said note and mortgage were executed he would' prosecute Merton G-. Hiett, the son of respondents, for embezzlement. The appellant denied that any such threats were made or that the note and mortgage were executed as the result of such threats. The action was tried,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hovey v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Shell v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Butler v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Field v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API