Legal Opinion
Ames Privilege Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Utica Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 24, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-30079-FPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREEDMAN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This diversity case was originally brought by Ames Privilege Associates Limited Partnership (“plaintiff” or “Ames”) against Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“defendant”) in Hampden County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The defendant is a New York corporation, and none of the Ames partners are citizens of New York. In April 1989, the case was removed to this Court on the defendant’s motion. In May 1989, the defendant filed a demand for a jury trial and began the process of discovery.
On November 22, 1989 the defendant filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norman W. OLIVER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Julie ROSSY, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ROCHE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Harold C. Yates and Eleanor Catherine YatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Royal-Globe Insurance v. SchultzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Cooper v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
- Ames Privilege Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.