Legal Opinion
Spitzer v. Shanley Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 22, 1993No. Nos. 89 Civ. 8549(MEL), 90 Civ. 6041(MEL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
These actions grow out of the contentious relationship between the general partner and the limited partners of Norstate Partnership (“Norstate”), an entity created under the laws of Oklahoma for the purpose of investing in oil and gas wells. Norstate’s general partner is Shanley Production Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shanley Corporation located in Dallas, Texas (collectively, “Shanley”). The limited partners are certain members of the law firm of Spitzer & Feld-man, P.C., which has its principal offices in New York City (“Spitzer Partners”).
As the result of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Atlanta Shipping Corp., Inc. v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Cathey v. First City Bank of Aransas Pass, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bonner v. GuccioneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Selletti v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Helinski v. Appleton PapersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Donovan v. Idant LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.