Legal Opinion

Helinski v. Appleton Papers

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 31, 1997No. Civil 93-3784, 94-2032, 94-2047, 94-2048PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MOTZ, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Mary Patricia Helinski, Ann Holcomb, Mildred Miller-Jackson and Brenda Smith bring these diversity actions against several paper manufacturers. Plaintiffs claim that their exposure to defendants’ carbonless copy paper (CCP) caused a variety of ailments broadly termed formaldehyde sensitization or multiple chemical sensitivity. Plaintiffs seek recovery under several theories, including negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability. Defendants move for summary judgment, primarily on the ground that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Locke v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Frasure v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
  4. Brin v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API