Legal Opinion

Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 11, 1997No. 95 CV 1857(FB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLOCK, District Judge:

The Court previously referred to Magistrate Judge Robert Levy for a report and recommendation (“R & R”) defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim which sought dismissal of the complaint with the exception of its Title VII claim against defendant Credit Suisse Asset Management (“CSAM”). Defendants have submitted objections (“Objections”) to the R & R issued by Magistrate Judge Levy on March 21, 1997.

The Court has considered plaintiffs objections and conducted a de novo review of the R & R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); see also United States v.…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Derby Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  2. Percy v. New York (Hudson Valley DDSO)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Mruz v. Caring, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Senecal v. B.G. Lenders Service LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  5. Manzi v. DiCarloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API