Legal Opinion
Balt. & Pot. Rr Co. v. Trustees, Etc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 18, 1875No. 47PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
91 U.S. 127 (____)
BALTIMORE AND POTOMAC RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
TRUSTEES OF SIXTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Daniel Clarke and Mr. Wayne Mac Veagh for the plaintiff in error.
The court declined hearing Mr. James A. Garfield and Mr. R.D. Mussey for the defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · CliffordJustice Clifford
Compensation was claimed in this case by the Trustees of the Sixth Presbyterian Church of this District for injuries occasioned to their real property by the railroad company; and they made application to a justice of the peace in and for the District, representing that the railroad company "have laid…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Bennett v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- New York & Cumberland R. Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- MacWhorter v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- King v. KingWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
- Fick v. TowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Colbert v. Holland Furnace Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.