Legal Opinion
Post v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, have brought this action in negligence to recover damages for loss of services and personal injuries respectively in connection with certain post operative treatment which the wife received.
*251The defendant is a domestic corporation engaged in conducting and maintaining a private hospital in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, and for a consideration furnishes services to patrons using its facilities.
On December 19, 1937, plaintiff Amelia Post was admitted to said hospital for the purpose of using its facilities in connection with an appendectomy…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Stuart Circle Hospital Corp. v. CurrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Hamburger v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People v. John H. Woodbury Dermatological InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Fowler, Admx. v. Norways SanatoriumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972