Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Regents of the University of Michigan v. Employment Relations Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1972No. Docket No. 11524Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcGregor, P. J.

I concur in my Brothers’ conclusion that The University of Michigan Board of Regents is a public employer. However, I am constrained to dissent from my Brothers’ holding that the interns, residents, and post-doctoral fellows are not “public employees” within the meaning of 1965 PA 379 (MCLA 423.201 et seq; MSA 17.455 [1] et seq).

The majority opinion holds that the interns, residents, and post-doctoral fellows cannot be characterized as employees because they are students. The fact that the members of the interns-residents association are “students” does not thereby preclude them from also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Stuart Circle Hospital Corp. v. CurrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Moeller v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Post v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API