Legal Opinion

Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

The issue is whether defendant, a private hospital operated for profit, is responsible for its nurse’s negligent acts, not administrative or clerical, but performed in relation to a patient’s medical care in connection with an operation performed in the hospital by the patient’s own surgeon.

Plaintiff was a paying patient in defendant’s private hospital concededly operated for profit. On October 25, 1947, an anal fistula was removed by defendant, Dr. Eisenstat, a surgeon engaged by plaintiff. During the operation • that was had under a general anesthetic, plaintiff, the patient, was severely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Claim of Renouf v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Mieryjeski v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Schneider v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API