Legal Opinion

Bakal v. University Heights Sanitarium, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

In this action for personal injuries, the undisputed evidence is that in October, 1947, plaintiff was a patient at the University Heights Sanitarium, a private hospital, and was operated upon by Dr. Eisenstat, a surgeon of her own choice. The purpose of the operation was to remove a fistula. The nature of the operation did not require the attendance or services of a trained nurse. In the course of the operation, while plaintiff was under anaesthesia, she sustained severe burns, caused by the application of an electric plate connected with an electrocautery knife. The plate was applied to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. New York Polyclinic Medical School & HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Blackburn v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Sutherland v. New York Polyclinic Medical School & HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Post v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kamps v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. May v. BrounOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. May v. BrounOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API