Helmer v. Shevlin-Mathieu Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Itasca county to recover $10,473.99 for cutting and removing timber from plaintiff’s land. The case was tried before Stanton, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $2,077.38. Defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was to recover for timber cut by defendant from an 80-acre tract of land in Itasca county claimed by plaintiff to have been owned by him at the time of the cutting. There was a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but not for a new trial. The motion was denied, judgment was entered on the verdict, and defendant appealed therefrom to this court.
1. Defendant not having moved for a new trial, we have only to consider whether there was error in denying the motion for judgment. Questions as to errors in the admission of evidence or in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Krumdick v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Purcell v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Daily v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- National Cash Register Co. v. MerriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Smith v. Gray Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Prigge v. SelzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.