Purcell v. Thornton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Swift county to ascertain the amount due to defendant under a certain mortgage and to permit plaintiff to redeem upon payment of the amount. The case was submitted upon stipulated facts to Flaherty, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Plaintiff owned a quarter section of land in Swift county. March 1, 1906, he executed two mortgages on the land, the first tO' Mary F. Johnson to secure his note for $2,500, the second to the Iowa Mortgage Loan & Investment Co., to secure his note for $125, given for the company’s commission in securing the loan from Mary P. Johnson ; this was subsequent to her mortgage. Default was made in the conditions of both mortgages. April 12, 1907, the loan company instituted proceedings to foreclose the $125 mortgage by advertisement. This mortgage did not contain a power of- sale. The notice,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Gregg v. Von PhulSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Johnson v. SandhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re OliverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Kuhlmann v. Educational Publishers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Schaefer v. NylinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Mineral Land Investment Co. v. Bishop Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.