Legal Opinion

Estates of Seay v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 2003No. 02-650PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WH. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

Before us now is the fifth appeal of this case and the second appeal of the November 29, 1999, order entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants have not filed a sufficient record to consider the issues appealed. As such, the case is affirmed.

The underlying facts leading to this case involve a dispute over the distribution of the assets of a liquidating trust which contained approximately 1,600 acres of land previously held by a closely-held family corporation called Wild Life Farms, Inc. (hereafter “WF”) and the resulting tax and asset issues that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. SD Leasing, Inc. v. RNF CORP.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Stewart v. WinfreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Ozark Auto Transportation, Inc. v. StarkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Seay v. Wildlife Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Kennedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Hudson v. KyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Rose Care, Inc. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API