Stewart v. Winfrey
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is a paternity and child support case in which the appellant, Waymond Stewart, was found to be the natural father of Rokeshia Lafaye Winfrey and was required to pay $70 weekly child support. He argues: (1) there was insufficient evidence that he was the natural father of the child; (2) the separation of powers doctrine was violated in the adoption of the child support chart; (3) the child support chart discriminates against legitimate non-divorce children in contravention of the equal protection clause.
A blood test showing a 99.27 % probability that Stewart was the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mine Creek Contractors, Inc. v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Bonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Randle v. NCNB Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hodges v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Travelers Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.