Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Winfrey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1992No. 91-126PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a paternity and child support case in which the appellant, Waymond Stewart, was found to be the natural father of Rokeshia Lafaye Winfrey and was required to pay $70 weekly child support. He argues: (1) there was insufficient evidence that he was the natural father of the child; (2) the separation of powers doctrine was violated in the adoption of the child support chart; (3) the child support chart discriminates against legitimate non-divorce children in contravention of the equal protection clause.

A blood test showing a 99.27 % probability that Stewart was the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mine Creek Contractors, Inc. v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Bonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Randle v. NCNB Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hodges v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Travelers Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API