Legal Opinion

United States v. James Francis Hill

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1963No. 15045_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying a motion to vacate sentence under Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 2255, and denying an alternative motion to correct illegal sentence under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18 U.S.C.

Following indictment in the Eastern District of Tennessee in November 1952, for transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce and for kidnapping, the District Court ordered a mental examination of the appellant, James Francis Hill, in accordance with Title 18 U.S.C., sec. 4244. As a result of this examination, Hill was committed to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. James Francis Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969
  2. Carroll v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  3. Churder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
  4. Padgett v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
  5. United States v. Donald R. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API