Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald R. Bennett

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 18, 1999No. 97-4078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

After Bennett’s conviction of bank robbery and other crimes was affirmed, United States v. Bennett, 908 F.2d 189 (7th Cir.1990), and after a number of motions to vacate his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and applications for leave to file successive such motions, were denied, Bennett filed a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) to “correct an illegal sentence,” on the ground that he had been mentally incompetent when he was sentenced. The district court denied the motion, and he appeals. The rule has since been amended, but the former rule remains applicable to offenses…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rafael Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Phillip D. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Donald Bennett and Steven R. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Thomas F. Page, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. William T. Plain and Colin E. GettyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugene A. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API