Legal Opinion

Bell v. Ardis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Osceola. Assumpsit. Pefendant Bell brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Judgment was rendered against *610Bell as a partner of Andrew H. Brandow, for a quantity of lumbering supplies purchased by Brandow and used by the firm in their lumbering business. The partnership being unknown to Ardis and the goods sold to Brandow, certain questions were argued concerning the sufficiency of the finding to show a joint liability.

But as a judgment was rendered for interest without such data as to enable us to determine what amount ■was due or what deduction if any to make from the judgment, — inasmuch as the dates of sales and period of credit are not set forth, we are compelled…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. White v. Township of MillbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Wright v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API